VotedBy VotedBy ⌕
Election Day · Tue, Nov 3See how your members of Congress voted →

S.J.Res. 42 · 118th Congress

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of…

Full title

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Food and Nutrition Service relating to "Application of Bostock v. Clayton County to Program Discrimination Complaint Processing-Policy Update".

Key: what the circles and colors mean

Each circle is a bill. The ring fills as it moves through Congress:

IntroducedPassed one chamberPassed both chambersBecame law (gold)Resolution agreed to (full, dark)Failed or vetoed (gray)

Under the number: the Yea · Nay count of its final (or latest) recorded vote. On a member's page, the small badge is how that member voted: Y Yea / Aye, N Nay / No, P Present, – Not voting.

Gold and violet are only for Yea and Nay; they never mean a party. A member's party is the letter on their photo.

  1. Senate Introduced Jul 27, 2023
  2. Senate Failed Oct 26, 2023 47–50

This joint resolution nullifies the policy update issued by the Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) on May 5, 2022, related to discrimination on the basis of gender identity and sexual orientation.

What it does: CRS summary · Introduced in Senate · Jul 27, 2023

This joint resolution nullifies the policy update issued by the Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) on May 5, 2022, related to discrimination on the basis of gender identity and sexual orientation.

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) deemed the policy update a rule on June 5, 2023, and therefore subject to the Congressional Review Act (CRA) requirement that a rule must be submitted to Congress and the GAO before it can take effect. The CRA also permits Congress to review and disapprove rules using specified procedures.

In June 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Bostock v. Clayton County that, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the prohibition on sex discrimination in employment includes discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity.

The FNS determined that the Bostock analysis also applies to certain FNS-enforced requirements under the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 because the requirements are sufficiently similar to those in the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

The FNS rule concludes that the prohibitions against sex discrimination in the FNS-enforced statutes prohibit discrimination on the basis of gender identity and sexual orientation. The rule also directs state agencies and program operators to handle complaints alleging discrimination on the basis of gender identity and sexual orientation as complaints of prohibited sex discrimination.

Written by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service. All summary versions on Congress.gov

Votes to become law

About this bill and sources

Official title: A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Food and Nutrition Service relating to "Application of Bostock v. Clayton County to Program Discrimination Complaint Processing-Policy Update".

Latest action (Oct 26, 2023): Failed of passage in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 47 - 50. Record Vote Number: 272.

Policy area: Agriculture and Food · Origin: Senate · Introduced: Jul 27, 2023

Official page on Congress.gov · Bill text (GovInfo) · Status record (XML) · Embed in your story

  1. Senate Introduced Jul 27, 2023
  2. Senate Failed Oct 26, 2023 47–50

Final vote · Senate · Oct 26, 2023

Passage — Joint Resolution Defeated. Vote details

Senate Majority Leader: Charles E. Schumer

Table of every position
MemberParty at voteSeatPosition
Dan SullivanRAKYea
Lisa MurkowskiRAKNay
Katie BrittRALYea
Tommy TubervilleRALYea
John BoozmanRARYea
Tom CottonRARYea
Kyrsten SinemaIAZNay
Mark KellyDAZNay
Alex PadillaDCANot Voting
Laphonza ButlerDCANay
John HickenlooperDCONay
Michael BennetDCONay
Christopher MurphyDCTNay
Richard BlumenthalDCTNay
Christopher CoonsDDENay
Thomas CarperDDENay
Marco RubioRFLYea
Rick ScottRFLYea
Jon OssoffDGANay
Raphael WarnockDGANay
Brian SchatzDHINay
Mazie HironoDHINay
Chuck GrassleyRIAYea
Joni ErnstRIAYea
James RischRIDYea
Mike CrapoRIDYea
Richard DurbinDILNay
Tammy DuckworthDILNay
Mike BraunRINYea
Todd YoungRINYea
Jerry MoranRKSYea
Roger MarshallRKSYea
Mitch McConnellRKYYea
Rand PaulRKYYea
Bill CassidyRLAYea
John KennedyRLAYea
Ed MarkeyDMANay
Elizabeth WarrenDMANay
Benjamin CardinDMDNay
Chris Van HollenDMDNay
Angus KingIMENot Voting
Susan CollinsRMENay
Debbie StabenowDMINay
Gary PetersDMINay
Amy KlobucharDMNNay
Tina SmithDMNNay
Eric SchmittRMOYea
Josh HawleyRMOYea
Cindy Hyde-SmithRMSYea
Roger WickerRMSYea
Jon TesterDMTNay
Steve DainesRMTYea
Ted BuddRNCYea
Thom TillisRNCYea
John HoevenRNDYea
Kevin CramerRNDYea
Deb FischerRNEYea
Pete RickettsRNEYea
Jeanne ShaheenDNHNay
Maggie HassanDNHNay
Bob MenendezDNJNay
Cory BookerDNJNay
Ben LujánDNMNay
Martin HeinrichDNMNay
Catherine Cortez MastoDNVNay
Jacky RosenDNVNay
Chuck SchumerDNYNay
Kirsten GillibrandDNYNay
J.D. VanceROHYea
Sherrod BrownDOHNay
James LankfordROKYea
Markwayne MullinROKYea
Jeff MerkleyDORNay
Ron WydenDORNay
Bob CaseyDPANay
John FettermanDPANay
Jack ReedDRINay
Sheldon WhitehouseDRINay
Lindsey GrahamRSCYea
Tim ScottRSCNot Voting
John ThuneRSDYea
Mike RoundsRSDYea
Bill HagertyRTNYea
Marsha BlackburnRTNYea
John CornynRTXYea
Ted CruzRTXYea
Mike LeeRUTYea
Mitt RomneyRUTYea
Mark WarnerDVANay
Tim KaineDVANay
Bernie SandersIVTNay
Peter WelchDVTNay
Maria CantwellDWANay
Patty MurrayDWANay
Ron JohnsonRWIYea
Tammy BaldwinDWINay
Joe ManchinDWVYea
Shelley CapitoRWVYea
Cynthia LummisRWYYea
John BarrassoRWYYea