VotedBy VotedBy ⌕
Election Day · Tue, Nov 3See how your members of Congress voted →

H.R. 926 · 118th Congress

Supreme Court Ethics, Recusal, and Transparency Act of 2023

Key: what the circles and colors mean

Each circle is a bill. The ring fills as it moves through Congress:

IntroducedPassed one chamberPassed both chambersBecame law (gold)Resolution agreed to (full, dark)Failed or vetoed (gray)

Under the number: the Yea · Nay count of its final (or latest) recorded vote. On a member's page, the small badge is how that member voted: Y Yea / Aye, N Nay / No, P Present, – Not voting.

Gold and violet are only for Yea and Nay; they never mean a party. A member's party is the letter on their photo.

Never voted on. It didn't reach a floor vote before the 118th Congress ended, so it expired. A bill has to be introduced again to be considered in a new Congress.

161 cosponsors · 161 D
DCD Cicilline JND Nadler MQD Quigley CAD Allred CBD Bush JBD Beatty BBD Balint ECD Cleaver JCD Courtney ACD Carson SCD Casten SCD Cherfilus-McCormick JCD Crockett CDD Deluzio MDD Dean AED Eshoo DED Evans CGD García SGD Garcia JHD Huffman GID Ivey BLD Lee SLD Lee BMD McCollum SMD Moulton END Norton AOD Ocasio-Cortez CPD Pingree MPD Pocan DRD Ross JRD Raskin JSD Schakowsky ASD Schiff JSD Sarbanes MSD Scanlon DTD Titus PTD Tonko RTD Tlaib DTD Trone NWD Williams BWD Watson Coleman EBD Blumenauer SBD Brown TCD Cárdenas ACD Craig JCD Crow DDD Davis LDD Doggett MDD DeSaulnier RGD Grijalva JGD Gomez DGD Goldman BHD Higgins RKD Krishnamoorthi TLD Leger Fernandez JMD McGovern KMD Mullin WND Nickel APD Pressley KPD Porter DSD Scott BTD Thompson LTD Trahan JTD Tokuda RGD Gallego JLD Larson TLD Lieu MLD Levin IOD Omar JPD Panetta DPD Phillips BSD Sherman ESD Slotkin HSD Scholten RTD Torres LUD Underwood SWD Wild JHD Himes JBD Brownley GCD Connolly GCD Casar JGD Garamendi SJD Jacobs AKD Kuster AKD Kim JMD Morelle MSD Sherrill SDD Davids MMD McGarvey SMD Magaziner GMD Meng JMD McClellan SCD Carbajal JND Neguse JGD Gottheimer PRD Ryan YCD Clarke MCD Cartwright VED Escobar MFD Frost RGD Garcia DKD Kilmer SLD Lee NVD Velázquez GAD Amo BFD Foster JAD Auchincloss PAD Aguilar TCD Carter LFD Frankel DKD Kildee RKD Kelly ASD Spanberger KSD Schrier FWD Wilson LBD Blunt Rochester NND (Nikki) Budzinski DDD Dingell VHD Hoyle JJD Jackson ZLD Lofgren ASD Smith LSD Sánchez GSD Stanton YCD Caraveo MGD Gluesenkamp Perez KMD Manning VFD Foushee SHD Horsford LMD McBath JHD Harder RMD Menendez MSD Stansbury NTD Torres CPD Pappas GLD Landsman DBD Beyer AED Espaillat JCD Costa LFD Fletcher JCD Castro MKD Kaptur TKD Kennedy FMD Mrvan TSD Suozzi JVD Vargas BPD Pettersen DRD Ramirez DND Norcross CRD Ruppersberger JHD Hayes ESD Sykes MWD Waters BBD Boyle DSD Soto MTD Takano ESD Sorensen HSD Stevens RDD DeLauro MSD Strickland STD Thanedar

3 signed on when it was introduced; the rest joined later. Cosponsors who withdrew aren't shown.

This bill makes various changes related to the ethical standards, financial disclosure requirements, and recusal requirements that apply to Supreme Court Justices.

What it does: CRS summary · Introduced in House · Feb 9, 2023

Supreme Court Ethics, Recusal, and Transparency Act of 2023

This bill makes various changes related to the ethical standards, financial disclosure requirements, and recusal requirements that apply to Supreme Court Justices.

Among the changes, the bill requires the Supreme Court to

  • adopt a code of conduct for Justices and establish procedures to receive and investigate complaints of judicial misconduct;
  • adopt rules governing the disclosure of gifts, travel, and income received by the Justices and law clerks that are at least as rigorous as the House and Senate disclosure rules; and
  • establish procedural rules requiring each party or amicus to disclose any gift, income, or reimbursement provided to Justices.

Additionally, the bill

  • expands the circumstances under which a Justice or judge must be disqualified; and
  • requires the Supreme Court and the Judicial Conference to establish procedural rules for prohibiting the filing of or striking an amicus brief that would result in the disqualification of a Justice, judge, or magistrate judge.

Written by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service. All summary versions on Congress.gov

About this bill and sources

Official title: Supreme Court Ethics, Recusal, and Transparency Act of 2023

Latest action (Feb 9, 2023): Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Policy area: Law · Origin: House · Introduced: Feb 9, 2023

Official page on Congress.gov · Bill text (GovInfo) · Status record (XML)

No recorded floor vote found.