Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the public health, safety, and welfare implications of licensure…

Full title

Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the public health, safety, and welfare implications of licensure of design professionals.

Key: what the circles and colors mean

Each circle is a bill. The ring fills as it moves through Congress:

IntroducedPassed one chamberPassed both chambersBecame law (gold)Resolution agreed to (full, dark)Failed or vetoed (gray)

Under the number: the Yea · Nay count of its final (or latest) recorded vote. On a member's page, the small badge is how that member voted: Y Yea / Aye, N Nay / No, P Present, – Not voting.

Gold and violet are only for Yea and Nay; they never mean a party. A member's party is the letter on their photo.

Never voted on. It didn't reach a floor vote before the 118th Congress ended, so it expired. A bill has to be introduced again to be considered in a new Congress.

R JoyceSponsor

2 cosponsors · 1 D, 1 R

D Bonamici SF

R Fitzgerald

0 signed on when it was introduced; the rest joined later. Cosponsors who withdrew aren't shown.

This concurrent resolution expresses the sense of Congress that states continuing to license design professions (such as architecture, engineering, surveying, and mapping) is in the best interest of public health, safety, and welfare.

What it does: CRS summary · Introduced in House · Mar 8, 2024

Written by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service. All summary versions on Congress.gov

About this bill and sources

Official title: Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the public health, safety, and welfare implications of licensure of design professionals.

Latest action (Mar 8, 2024): Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.

Policy area: Labor and Employment · Origin: House · Introduced: Mar 8, 2024

Official page on Congress.gov · Bill text (GovInfo) · Status record (XML)

No recorded floor vote found.