H.Res. 1028 · 117th Congress
Supporting the current definition of materiality in the securities laws and opposing new disclosure…
Full title
Supporting the current definition of materiality in the securities laws and opposing new disclosure requirements outside the core mission of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Key: what the circles and colors mean
Each circle is a bill. The ring fills as it moves through Congress:
Under the number: the Yea · Nay count of its final (or latest) recorded vote. On a member's page, the small badge is how that member voted: Y Yea / Aye, N Nay / No, P Present, – Not voting.
Gold and violet are only for Yea and Nay; they never mean a party. A member's party is the letter on their photo.
Never voted on. It didn't reach a floor vote before the 117th Congress ended, so it expired. A bill has to be introduced again to be considered in a new Congress.
R
JoyceSponsor7 cosponsors · 7 R
5 signed on when it was introduced; the rest joined later. Cosponsors who withdrew aren't shown.
This resolution supports the current definition of materiality under securities law and opposes certain new disclosure requirements for companies.
What it does: CRS summary · Introduced in House · Apr 5, 2022
This resolution supports the current definition of materiality under securities law and opposes certain new disclosure requirements for companies.
Written by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service. All summary versions on Congress.gov
About this bill and sources
Official title: Supporting the current definition of materiality in the securities laws and opposing new disclosure requirements outside the core mission of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Latest action (Apr 5, 2022): Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Policy area: Finance and Financial Sector · Origin: House · Introduced: Apr 5, 2022
Official page on Congress.gov · Bill text (GovInfo) · Status record (XML)
No recorded floor vote found.