VotedBy VotedBy ⌕
Election Day · Tue, Nov 3See how your members of Congress voted →

S. 660 · 116th Congress

Efficiency and Transparency in Petitions Act

Key: what the circles and colors mean

Each circle is a bill. The ring fills as it moves through Congress:

IntroducedPassed one chamberPassed both chambersBecame law (gold)Resolution agreed to (full, dark)Failed or vetoed (gray)

Under the number: the Yea · Nay count of its final (or latest) recorded vote. On a member's page, the small badge is how that member voted: Y Yea / Aye, N Nay / No, P Present, – Not voting.

Gold and violet are only for Yea and Nay; they never mean a party. A member's party is the letter on their photo.

Never voted on. It didn't reach a floor vote before the 116th Congress ended, so it expired. A bill has to be introduced again to be considered in a new Congress.

MBR BraunSponsor

No cosponsors.

This bill requires a petition regarding a pending generic drug or biological product application to be submitted to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)within one year of when the petitioner discovers the issue that is the basis for the petition.

What it does: CRS summary · Introduced in Senate · Mar 5, 2019

Efficiency and Transparency in Petitions Act

This bill requires a petition regarding a pending generic drug or biological product application to be submitted to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)within one year of when the petitioner discovers the issue that is the basis for the petition.

The FDA may grant a waiver of the one-year deadline.

Written by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service. All summary versions on Congress.gov

About this bill and sources

Official title: Efficiency and Transparency in Petitions Act

Latest action (Mar 5, 2019): Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.

Policy area: Health · Origin: Senate · Introduced: Mar 5, 2019

Official page on Congress.gov · Bill text (GovInfo) · Status record (XML)

No recorded floor vote found.