S. 2632 · 116th Congress
Judicial Travel Accountability Act
Key: what the circles and colors mean
Each circle is a bill. The ring fills as it moves through Congress:
Under the number: the Yea · Nay count of its final (or latest) recorded vote. On a member's page, the small badge is how that member voted: Y Yea / Aye, N Nay / No, P Present, – Not voting.
Gold and violet are only for Yea and Nay; they never mean a party. A member's party is the letter on their photo.
Never voted on. It didn't reach a floor vote before the 116th Congress ended, so it expired. A bill has to be introduced again to be considered in a new Congress.
D
WhitehouseSponsor10 cosponsors · 10 D
D
Brown
RB
D
Blumenthal
CB
D
Booker
RD
D
Durbin
AK
D
Klobuchar
PL
D
Leahy
EM
D
Markey
RW
D
Wyden
MH
D
Hirono
JS
D
Shaheen8 signed on when it was introduced; the rest joined later. Cosponsors who withdrew aren't shown.
This bill requires a judicial officer to annually disclose (1) the source, description, and value of certain gifts; (2) a detailed description of meetings and events attended, including the names of other known attendees; and (3) total expenses for transportation, lodging, and meals.
What it does: CRS summary · Introduced in Senate · Oct 17, 2019
Judicial Travel Accountability Act
This bill requires a judicial officer to annually disclose (1) the source, description, and value of certain gifts; (2) a detailed description of meetings and events attended, including the names of other known attendees; and (3) total expenses for transportation, lodging, and meals.
Written by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service. All summary versions on Congress.gov
About this bill and sources
Official title: Judicial Travel Accountability Act
Latest action (Oct 17, 2019): Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Policy area: Government Operations and Politics · Origin: Senate · Introduced: Oct 17, 2019
Official page on Congress.gov · Bill text (GovInfo) · Status record (XML)
No recorded floor vote found.