VotedBy VotedBy ⌕
Election Day · Tue, Nov 3See how your members of Congress voted →

S. 1097 · 115th Congress

Armed Forces Reserve and National Guard Dual-Status Review and Modernization Act

Key: what the circles and colors mean

Each circle is a bill. The ring fills as it moves through Congress:

IntroducedPassed one chamberPassed both chambersBecame law (gold)Resolution agreed to (full, dark)Failed or vetoed (gray)

Under the number: the Yea · Nay count of its final (or latest) recorded vote. On a member's page, the small badge is how that member voted: Y Yea / Aye, N Nay / No, P Present, – Not voting.

Gold and violet are only for Yea and Nay; they never mean a party. A member's party is the letter on their photo.

Never voted on. It didn't reach a floor vote before the 115th Congress ended, so it expired. A bill has to be introduced again to be considered in a new Congress.

No cosponsors.

Armed Forces Reserve and National Guard Dual-Status Review and Modernization Act

What it does: CRS summary · Introduced in Senate · May 11, 2017

Armed Forces Reserve and National Guard Dual-Status Review and Modernization Act

This bill postpones the deadline for conversion of at least 20% of all military technician (dual status) positions to positions of civilian employment in the federal government until 180 days after the Department of Defense transmits to Congress the report of the Working Group on Full Time Support of the Reserve Components, established by this bill.

The working group shall undertake a comprehensive review of full-time support of the reserve components of the Armed Forces, including:

  • an identification of the missions, purposes, and objectives of military technicians (dual status) in support of an operational reserve force;
  • a review of the posture of such positions and their role in meeting such objectives;
  • an analysis of potential workforce restructuring to fully align such positions with objectives for full-time support of the reserve components;
  • an identification of such positions the conversion of which to federal civilian positions would best ensure the achievement of such objectives;
  • an assessment of the impact of such conversion on the readiness of the National Guard for domestic operations; and
  • an assessment of costs and potential savings associated with such conversion.

Written by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service. All summary versions on Congress.gov

About this bill and sources

Official title: Armed Forces Reserve and National Guard Dual-Status Review and Modernization Act

Latest action (May 11, 2017): Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S2918; text of measure as introduced: CR S2917-2918)

Policy area: Armed Forces and National Security · Origin: Senate · Introduced: May 11, 2017

Official page on Congress.gov · Bill text (GovInfo) · Status record (XML)

No recorded floor vote found.