H.R. 725 · 115th Congress
Innocent Party Protection Act
Key: what the circles and colors mean
Each circle is a bill. The ring fills as it moves through Congress:
Under the number: the Yea · Nay count of its final (or latest) recorded vote. On a member's page, the small badge is how that member voted: Y Yea / Aye, N Nay / No, P Present, – Not voting.
Gold and violet are only for Yea and Nay; they never mean a party. A member's party is the letter on their photo.
5 cosponsors · 5 R
4 signed on when it was introduced; the rest joined later. Cosponsors who withdrew aren't shown.
- House Introduced Jan 30, 2017
- House Passed Mar 9, 2017 224–194
Joinder of such a defendant is fraudulent if the court finds:
What it does: CRS summary · Passed House without amendment · Mar 9, 2017
(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The expanded summary of the House reported version is repeated here.)
Innocent Party Protection Act
(Sec. 2) This bill amends procedures under which federal courts determine whether a case that was removed from a state court to a federal court on the basis of a diversity of citizenship among the parties may be remanded back to state court upon a motion opposed on fraudulent joinder grounds that: (1) one or more defendants are citizens of the same state as one or more plaintiffs, or (2) one or more defendants properly joined and served are citizens of the state in which the action was brought.Joinder of such a defendant is fraudulent if the court finds:
- actual fraud in the pleading of jurisdictional facts with respect to that defendant,
- state law would not plausibly impose liability on that defendant,
- state or federal law bars all claims in the complaint against that defendant, or
- no good faith intention to prosecute the action against that defendant or to seek a joint judgment including that defendant.
In determining whether to grant or deny such a motion for remand, the court: (1) may permit pleadings to be amended; and (2) must consider the pleadings, affidavits, and other evidence submitted by the parties.
A federal court finding that all such defendants have been fraudulently joined must: (1) dismiss without prejudice the claims against those defendants, and (2) deny the motion for remand.
Written by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service. All summary versions on Congress.gov
Votes to become law
About this bill and sources
Official title: Innocent Party Protection Act
Latest action (Mar 13, 2017): Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Policy area: Law · Origin: House · Introduced: Jan 30, 2017
Official page on Congress.gov · Bill text (GovInfo) · Status record (XML) · Embed in your story
- House Introduced Jan 30, 2017
- House Passed Mar 9, 2017 224–194
Final vote · House · Mar 9, 2017
Passage — Passed. Vote details
Speaker of the House: Paul D. Ryan
Table of every position
All recorded votes (4)
- Passage Passed
House · Mar 9, 2017 · “On Passage” · Speaker: Paul D. Ryan - Sending back to committee (motion to recommit) Failed
House · Mar 9, 2017 · “On Motion to Recommit with Instructions” · Speaker: Paul D. Ryan - Amendment Failed
House · Mar 9, 2017 · “On Agreeing to the Amendment” · Speaker: Paul D. Ryan - Amendment Failed
House · Mar 9, 2017 · “On Agreeing to the Amendment” · Speaker: Paul D. Ryan