H.R. 6400 · 115th Congress
United States Ports of Entry Threat and Operational Review Act
Law · 115-372 · Dec 21, 2018Key: what the circles and colors mean
Each circle is a bill. The ring fills as it moves through Congress:
Under the number: the Yea · Nay count of its final (or latest) recorded vote. On a member's page, the small badge is how that member voted: Y Yea / Aye, N Nay / No, P Present, – Not voting.
Gold and violet are only for Yea and Nay; they never mean a party. A member's party is the letter on their photo.
Became law without a recorded vote. It passed by voice vote or unanimous consent, which don't record how each member voted.
33 cosponsors · 33 R
15 signed on when it was introduced; the rest joined later. Cosponsors who withdrew aren't shown.
- House Introduced Jul 17, 2018
- House Passed Sep 4, 2018
- Senate Passed Dec 19, 2018
- President To the President Dec 21, 2018
- President Signed Dec 21, 2018
- Law Dec 21, 2018
United States Ports of Entry Threat and Operational Review Act
What it does: CRS summary · Public Law · Dec 21, 2018
United States Ports of Entry Threat and Operational Review Act
(Sec. 2) This bill directs U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to submit to the congressional homeland security and tax committees a threat and operational analysis of U.S. air, land, and sea ports of entry.
Such analysis shall include an assessment of:
- current and potential threats posed by individuals and organized groups seeking to exploit security vulnerabilities at ports of entry or to unlawfully enter the United States through such ports of entry;
- methods and pathways used to exploit security vulnerabilities at ports of entry;
- improvements needed at ports of entry to prevent the unlawful movement of people, illicit drugs, and other contraband across U.S. borders;
- improvements needed to enhance travel and trade facilitation and reduce wait times at ports of entry; and
- processes conducted at ports of entry that do not require law enforcement training and could be filled with non-law enforcement staff or by the private sector or be automated.
In compiling such analysis, CBP shall consider and examine: (1) personnel needs, including K-9 units, and estimated costs, at each port of entry; (2) technology needs, including radiation portal monitors and non-intrustive inspection technology, and estimated costs at each port of entry; and (3) infrastructure needs and estimated costs at each port of entry.
CBP shall, at specified intervals, provide to the committees a ports of entry strategy and implementation plan.
Written by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service. All summary versions on Congress.gov
About this bill and sources
Official title: United States Ports of Entry Threat and Operational Review Act
Latest action (Dec 21, 2018): Became Public Law No: 115-372.
Policy area: Emergency Management · Origin: House · Introduced: Jul 17, 2018
Official page on Congress.gov · Bill text (GovInfo) · Status record (XML)
- House Introduced Jul 17, 2018
- House Passed Sep 4, 2018
- Senate Passed Dec 19, 2018
- President To the President Dec 21, 2018
- President Signed Dec 21, 2018
- Law Dec 21, 2018
No recorded floor vote found.