H.R. 2936 · 115th Congress
Resilient Federal Forests Act of 2017
Key: what the circles and colors mean
Each circle is a bill. The ring fills as it moves through Congress:
Under the number: the Yea · Nay count of its final (or latest) recorded vote. On a member's page, the small badge is how that member voted: Y Yea / Aye, N Nay / No, P Present, – Not voting.
Gold and violet are only for Yea and Nay; they never mean a party. A member's party is the letter on their photo.
18 cosponsors · 2 D, 16 R
6 signed on when it was introduced; the rest joined later. Cosponsors who withdrew aren't shown.
- House Introduced Jun 20, 2017
- House Passed Nov 1, 2017 232–188
This bill shall apply whenever the Department concerned, either the Department of Agriculture for National Forest System (NFS) lands or the Department of the Interior for public lands, prepares an environmental assessment or an environmental impact statement pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) for specified forest management…
What it does: CRS summary · Introduced in House · Jun 20, 2017
Resilient Federal Forests Act of 2017
This bill shall apply whenever the Department concerned, either the Department of Agriculture for National Forest System (NFS) lands or the Department of the Interior for public lands, prepares an environmental assessment or an environmental impact statement pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) for specified forest management activities, including those that:
- will occur on lands identified as suitable for timber production; or
- will occur on a landscape-scale area designated by the Department concerned as part of an insect and disease treatment program on NSF land pursuant to the Healthy Forests Restoration Act of 2003, notwithstanding whether such activity is initiated before September 30, 2018.
In such an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement, the Department concerned shall study, develop, and describe only these two alternatives:
- the forest management activity, and
- the alternative of no action.
In the case of the alternative of no action, the Department concerned shall evaluate:
- the effect of no action on forest health, habitat diversity, wildfire potential, insect and disease potential, and timber production; and
- the implications of a resulting decline in forest health, loss of habitat diversity, wildfire, or insect or disease infestation on domestic water supply in the project area, wildlife habitat loss, and other economic and social factors.
The bill establishes categorical exclusions regarding certain other forest management actions.
A process is established for declaration of a major disaster for wildfire on federal lands managed by specified federal land management agencies.
Written by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service. All summary versions on Congress.gov
Votes to become law
About this bill and sources
Official title: Resilient Federal Forests Act of 2017
Latest action (Nov 2, 2017): Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Policy area: Public Lands and Natural Resources · Origin: House · Introduced: Jun 20, 2017
Official page on Congress.gov · Bill text (GovInfo) · Status record (XML) · Embed in your story
- House Introduced Jun 20, 2017
- House Passed Nov 1, 2017 232–188
Final vote · House · Nov 1, 2017
Passage — Passed. Vote details
Speaker of the House: Paul D. Ryan
Table of every position
All recorded votes (5)
- Passage Passed
House · Nov 1, 2017 · “On Passage” · Speaker: Paul D. Ryan - Sending back to committee (motion to recommit) Failed
House · Nov 1, 2017 · “On Motion to Recommit with Instructions” · Speaker: Paul D. Ryan - Amendment Agreed to
House · Nov 1, 2017 · “On Agreeing to the Amendment” · Speaker: Paul D. Ryan - Amendment Failed
House · Nov 1, 2017 · “On Agreeing to the Amendment” · Speaker: Paul D. Ryan - Amendment Failed
House · Nov 1, 2017 · “On Agreeing to the Amendment” · Speaker: Paul D. Ryan