H.R. 1899 · 115th Congress
Protecting Data at the Border Act
Key: what the circles and colors mean
Each circle is a bill. The ring fills as it moves through Congress:
Under the number: the Yea · Nay count of its final (or latest) recorded vote. On a member's page, the small badge is how that member voted: Y Yea / Aye, N Nay / No, P Present, – Not voting.
Gold and violet are only for Yea and Nay; they never mean a party. A member's party is the letter on their photo.
Never voted on. It didn't reach a floor vote before the 115th Congress ended, so it expired. A bill has to be introduced again to be considered in a new Congress.
D
PolisSponsor24 cosponsors · 23 D, 1 R
D
Beyer
BF
R
Farenthold
AS
D
Smith
BR
D
Rush
SC
D
Cohen
TG
D
Gabbard
EB
D
Blumenauer
SD
D
DelBene
LG
D
Gutiérrez
PJ
D
Jayapal
EN
D
Norton
JR
D
Raskin
DK
D
Kilmer
MV
D
Veasey
MD
D
DeSaulnier
TL
D
Lieu
DD
D
DeGette
DC
D
Cicilline
ZL
D
Lofgren
PD
D
DeFazio
JS
D
Schakowsky
AE
D
Espaillat
CS
D
Shea-Porter
MT
D
Takano3 signed on when it was introduced; the rest joined later. Cosponsors who withdrew aren't shown.
This bill prohibits a governmental entity from: (1) accessing the digital contents of electronic equipment belonging to, or in the possession of, a U.S. person (person) at the border without a valid warrant; or (2) denying a person's U.S.
What it does: CRS summary · Introduced in House · Apr 4, 2017
Protecting Data at the Border Act
This bill prohibits a governmental entity from: (1) accessing the digital contents of electronic equipment belonging to, or in the possession of, a U.S. person (person) at the border without a valid warrant; or (2) denying a person's U.S. entry or exit based on the person's refusal to disclose an access credential or in order to determine whether such person will consensually provide an access credential, access, or online account information.
A border officer may access the digital contents of electronic equipment without a warrant if the officer determines that an emergency situation exists. The officer must subsequently apply for a warrant within seven days, and if such warrant is not granted: (1) digital content copies must be destroyed, (2) digital contents or information may not be disclosed, and (3) the person shall be notified of such destruction.
A governmental entity may not make or retain a copy of the digital contents of electronic equipment, an online account, or online account information without probable cause to believe that such information contains evidence of, or constitutes the fruits of, a crime.
Unlawfully accessed information: (1) must be destroyed and the person notified of its destruction; (2) may not be disclosed; and (3) may not be received in evidence in any trial, hearing, or other proceeding.
A governmental entity shall keep a record of each instance in which it obtains access to an individual's digital information.
A governmental entity may not seize electronic equipment belonging to, or in the possession of, a person at the border without probable cause to believe that such equipment contains information relevant to a felony.
Written by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service. All summary versions on Congress.gov
About this bill and sources
Official title: Protecting Data at the Border Act
Latest action (Apr 26, 2017): Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security, and Investigations.
Policy area: Immigration · Origin: House · Introduced: Apr 4, 2017
Official page on Congress.gov · Bill text (GovInfo) · Status record (XML)
No recorded floor vote found.