VotedBy VotedBy ⌕
Election Day · Tue, Nov 3See how your members of Congress voted →

H.R. 2867 · 114th Congress

Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2015

Key: what the circles and colors mean

Each circle is a bill. The ring fills as it moves through Congress:

IntroducedPassed one chamberPassed both chambersBecame law (gold)Resolution agreed to (full, dark)Failed or vetoed (gray)

Under the number: the Yea · Nay count of its final (or latest) recorded vote. On a member's page, the small badge is how that member voted: Y Yea / Aye, N Nay / No, P Present, – Not voting.

Gold and violet are only for Yea and Nay; they never mean a party. A member's party is the letter on their photo.

Never voted on. It didn't reach a floor vote before the 114th Congress ended, so it expired. A bill has to be introduced again to be considered in a new Congress.

179 cosponsors · 179 D
JCD Chu JLD Lewis LSD Sánchez MVD Veasey EBD Blumenauer RBD Brady GKD Butterfield KBD Bass JBD Beatty CBD Bustos BBD Boyle JCD Clyburn JCD Conyers SCD Cohen JCD Courtney JCD Carney JCD Castro DDD Davis DDD DeGette RDD DeLauro LDD Doggett MDD DeSaulnier KED Ellison DED Edwards CFD Fattah GGD Green AHD Hastings SHD Hoyer MHD Honda JHD Himes JHD Hahn JHD Huffman SID Israel SJD Jackson Lee HJD Johnson MKD Kaptur RKD Kind DKD Kilmer RKD Kelly BLD Lee BLD Luján BLD Lawrence TLD Lieu JMD McGovern GMD Meeks BMD McCollum DMD Matsui SMD Maloney JND Nadler RND Nolan END Norton DND Norcross FPD Pallone NPD Pelosi DPD Price EPD Perlmutter SPD Plaskett MQD Quigley LRD Roybal-Allard CRD Ruppersberger CRD Richmond JSD Schakowsky MTD Thompson NTD Tsongas NTD Torres CVD Van Hollen MWD Waters DWD Wasserman Schultz PWD Welch JYD Yarmuth DCD Cicilline SLD Levin JLD Larson GND Napolitano ASD Sires MTD Takai FWD Wilson SDD DelBene JPD Polis JSD Serrano AKD Kirkpatrick AAD Adams EED Engel LFD Frankel GMD Meng PMD Murphy PTD Tonko MTD Takano PAD Aguilar BOD O’Rourke ECD Cummings PDD DeFazio JDD Delaney BFD Foster JLD Langevin CMD Maloney GMD Moore SMD Moulton LSD Slaughter KCD Castor EJD Johnson RND Neal JCD Crowley DBD Beyer RHD Hinojosa DKD Kildee NLD Lowey LGD Gutiérrez JGD Garamendi ZLD Lofgren PVD Visclosky TWD Walz KRD Rice JSD Speier XBD Becerra AGD Green DHD Heck JSD Sarbanes DTD Titus SBD Bishop CBD Brown WCD Clay ECD Cleaver YCD Clarke ACD Carson MFD Fudge HJD Jeffries DPD Payne CRD Rangel BRD Rush BSD Scott BTD Thompson BWD Watson Coleman SDD Davis AKD Kuster LSD Sanchez ASD Smith LCD Capps GCD Connolly MCD Cartwright KCD Clark TDD Deutch AED Eshoo SFD Farr RGD Grijalva MLD Lujan Grisham JMD McNerney BPD Pascrell MPD Pocan DSD Scott ESD Swalwell JVD Vargas JBD Brownley TCD Cárdenas TDD Duckworth CPD Pingree NVD Velázquez SBD Bonamici MCD Capuano MDD Doyle EED Esty RGD Gallego BHD Higgins WKD Keating RLD Larsen JMD McDermott ASD Schiff KSD Schrader AGD Grayson DLD Loebsack TRD Ryan ABD Bera DDD Dingell BSD Sherman JCD Costa SLD Lynch ALD Lowenthal JKD Kennedy GGD Graham

4 signed on when it was introduced; the rest joined later. Cosponsors who withdrew aren't shown.

This bill amends the Voting Rights Act of 1965 to allow a representative official of an Indian tribe, with authorization from the governing body of the tribe, to request one or more polling places to be located on tribal lands.

What it does: CRS summary · Introduced in House · Jun 24, 2015

Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2015

This bill amends the Voting Rights Act of 1965 to allow a representative official of an Indian tribe, with authorization from the governing body of the tribe, to request one or more polling places to be located on tribal lands. The state or political subdivision shall provide each requested polling place at no expense to the Indian tribe if certain criteria are met.

A federal court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce constitutional voting guarantees, but also certain violations of the Act as well as of any federal prohibition against discrimination on the basis of race, color, or membership in a language minority group, for an appropriate period to prevent commencement of new devices to deny or abridge the right to vote.

Requirements are revised for determining which states and political subdivisions are or are not covered by criteria for declaratory judgments that they have not used devices to deny or abridge the right to vote.

Any state (and all of its political subdivisions) shall be subject to such requirements for a 10-year period if:

  • 15 or more voting rights violations occurred there during the previous 25 years; or
  • 10 or more violations occurred during the previous 25 years, at least one of which was committed by the state itself (as opposed to a political subdivision within it).

Any specific political subdivision of a state shall also be subject to those requirements for a 10-year period if 3 or more violations occurred in it during the previous 25 calendar years.

A state or political subdivision that obtains a declaratory judgment that it has not used a device to deny or abridge the right to vote shall be exempt from such requirements unless new violations occur after the declaratory judgment was issued.

Each state and each political subdivision shall: (1) identify any newly enacted or adopted law, regulation, or policy that includes a voting qualification or prerequisite to voting, or a voting-related standard, practice, or procedure (covered practice); and (2) ensure that no such covered practice is implemented unless or until the state or political subdivision complies with certain preclearance requirements.

This bill prescribes transparency requirements, including reasonable public notice, regarding any changes to: (1) voting prerequisites, standards, or procedures; (2) polling place resources; or (3) demographics and electoral districts.

Department of Justice authority to assign observers receives new extensions, including authority to assign observers to enforce bilingual election requirements.

Courts shall grant preliminary injunctive relief if a complainant raises a serious question whether the challenged covered practice violates the Act or the Constitution and, on balance, the hardship imposed upon the defendant by the relief will be less than the hardship on the plaintiff if the relief were not granted.

Written by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service. All summary versions on Congress.gov

About this bill and sources

Official title: Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2015

Latest action (Jun 15, 2016): Motion to Discharge Committee filed by Mr. Aguilar. Petition No: 114-4. (<a href="http://clerk.house.gov/114/lrc/pd/petitions/DisPet0004.xml">Discharge petition</a> text with signatures.)

Policy area: Government Operations and Politics · Origin: House · Introduced: Jun 24, 2015

Official page on Congress.gov · Bill text (GovInfo) · Status record (XML)

No recorded floor vote found.