H.R. 1896 · 114th Congress
Demand Letter Transparency Act of 2015
Key: what the circles and colors mean
Each circle is a bill. The ring fills as it moves through Congress:
Under the number: the Yea · Nay count of its final (or latest) recorded vote. On a member's page, the small badge is how that member voted: Y Yea / Aye, N Nay / No, P Present, – Not voting.
Gold and violet are only for Yea and Nay; they never mean a party. A member's party is the letter on their photo.
Never voted on. It didn't reach a floor vote before the 114th Congress ended, so it expired. A bill has to be introduced again to be considered in a new Congress.
2 cosponsors · 1 D, 1 R
2 signed on when it was introduced; the rest joined later. Cosponsors who withdrew aren't shown.
Requires any entity that sends a specified number of demand letters during any 365-day period to submit to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), with respect to each patent that was the subject in each letter, a disclosure identifying:
What it does: CRS summary · Introduced in House · Apr 20, 2015
Demand Letter Transparency Act of 2015
Requires any entity that sends a specified number of demand letters during any 365-day period to submit to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), with respect to each patent that was the subject in each letter, a disclosure identifying:
- the patent, including a confirmation that the entity that sent the letter is the owner of the patent and is the last recorded entity in USPTO records for purposes of assignment, grant, or conveyance;
- the entity that has the right to license the patent or the name of the exclusive licensee;
- each entity asserting a claim with regard to the patent;
- each obligation to license the patent and the financial terms at which such patent has been licensed;
- the ultimate parent entity of such entity;
- the number of recipients of the letter;
- any case that has been filed by such entity relating to such patent; and
- any ex parte review or inter partes review of such patent.
Defines "demand letter" as any written communication directed to an unaffiliated third party stating or indicating that the intended recipient, or anyone affiliated with that recipient, is or may be infringing a patent, or may bear liability or owe compensation to another because of such patent.
Authorizes a court, in a patent infringement or validity action brought by an entity that does not meet such USPTO disclosure requirements, to sanction such entity for an amount to be awarded to the adverse party to cover any costs incurred as a result of such violation.
Exempts from such disclosure requirements: (1) original or joint inventors, (2) institutions of higher education, and (3) technology transfer organizations facilitating the commercialization of technology developed by institutions of higher education.
Directs the USPTO to establish a publicly accessible and searchable database of the information obtained pursuant to such disclosures.
Requires any demand letter sent to another entity to include specified information concerning:
- each claim of each patent allegedly infringed, including each accused instrumentality;
- each party alleging infringement;
- the direct infringement for each claim alleged to have been infringed indirectly;
- the principal business of the party alleging infringement;
- each complaint filed that asserts or asserted any of the same patents, each case filed by such entity, and any ex parte or inter partes review for each patent;
- whether the patent is subject to any licensing term or pricing commitments;
- owners, co-owners, assignees, or exclusive licensees of the patent;
- any person who has a legal right to enforce the patent;
- any person with a direct financial interest in the outcome of the action; and
- how the recipient can access the USPTO demand letter database.
Permits a recipient of a demand letter to file a petition with the USPTO if it believes that disclosure or patent letter information requirements have not been met. Directs the USPTO, if it determines that a requirement has not been met, to notify the patent owner that the patent will be voided unless a fee is paid.
Requires the USPTO to consider good faith mistakes in the determination of whether to void a patent.
Written by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service. All summary versions on Congress.gov
About this bill and sources
Official title: Demand Letter Transparency Act of 2015
Latest action (May 15, 2015): Referred to the Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet.
Policy area: Commerce · Origin: House · Introduced: Apr 20, 2015
Official page on Congress.gov · Bill text (GovInfo) · Status record (XML)
No recorded floor vote found.