H.Res. 214 · 113th Congress
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that extensive scientific and technical studies and…
Full title
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that extensive scientific and technical studies and analyses by the Department of State and other Federal agencies have affirmed that the proposed Keystone XL pipeline is an environmentally sound project.
Key: what the circles and colors mean
Each circle is a bill. The ring fills as it moves through Congress:
Under the number: the Yea · Nay count of its final (or latest) recorded vote. On a member's page, the small badge is how that member voted: Y Yea / Aye, N Nay / No, P Present, – Not voting.
Gold and violet are only for Yea and Nay; they never mean a party. A member's party is the letter on their photo.
Never voted on. It didn't reach a floor vote before the 113th Congress ended, so it expired. A bill has to be introduced again to be considered in a new Congress.
R
WeberSponsor11 cosponsors · 11 R
R
Cramer
RH
R
Hall
RN
R
Neugebauer
FS
R
Sensenbrenner
LS
R
Smith
SS
R
Stockman
DS
R
Schweikert
CS
R
Stewart
PB
R
Broun
JK
R
Kingston
JB
R
Bridenstine8 signed on when it was introduced; the rest joined later. Cosponsors who withdrew aren't shown.
Expresses the sense of the House of Representatives that the government's scientific and technical analysis of the potential environmental impacts of the Keystone XL pipeline have repeatedly affirmed its environmental soundness and safety.
What it does: CRS summary · Introduced in House · May 15, 2013
Expresses the sense of the House of Representatives that the government's scientific and technical analysis of the potential environmental impacts of the Keystone XL pipeline have repeatedly affirmed its environmental soundness and safety.
Written by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service. All summary versions on Congress.gov
About this bill and sources
Official title: Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that extensive scientific and technical studies and analyses by the Department of State and other Federal agencies have affirmed that the proposed Keystone XL pipeline is an environmentally sound project.
Latest action (May 15, 2013): Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
Policy area: Environmental Protection · Origin: House · Introduced: May 15, 2013
Official page on Congress.gov · Bill text (GovInfo) · Status record (XML)
No recorded floor vote found.