VotedBy VotedBy ⌕
Election Day · Tue, Nov 3See how your members of Congress voted →

H.Res. 343 · 112th Congress

Expressing disapproval of the decision by the Supreme Court in Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc.

Key: what the circles and colors mean

Each circle is a bill. The ring fills as it moves through Congress:

IntroducedPassed one chamberPassed both chambersBecame law (gold)Resolution agreed to (full, dark)Failed or vetoed (gray)

Under the number: the Yea · Nay count of its final (or latest) recorded vote. On a member's page, the small badge is how that member voted: Y Yea / Aye, N Nay / No, P Present, – Not voting.

Gold and violet are only for Yea and Nay; they never mean a party. A member's party is the letter on their photo.

Never voted on. It didn't reach a floor vote before the 112th Congress ended, so it expired. A bill has to be introduced again to be considered in a new Congress.

No cosponsors.

Disapproves of the majority opinion in Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc. , because it puts prescribers at risk of having their prescriber-identifying information sold without their knowledge or consent.

What it does: CRS summary · Introduced in House · Jul 8, 2011

Disapproves of the majority opinion in Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc., because it puts prescribers at risk of having their prescriber-identifying information sold without their knowledge or consent.

Expresses the belief of the House of Representatives that: (1) the Supreme Court incorrectly applied a heightened First Amendment standard of review to an instance of commercial regulation; (2) the negative impact on a pharmaceutical manufacturer's ability to market its products is outweighed by the interests of patient safety, doctor privacy, and health care costs; and (3) the states have the right to regulate the pharmaceutical industry based on what is best for the health and safety of their residents.

Written by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service. All summary versions on Congress.gov

About this bill and sources

Official title: Expressing disapproval of the decision by the Supreme Court in Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc.

Latest action (Aug 25, 2011): Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution.

Policy area: Health · Origin: House · Introduced: Jul 8, 2011

Official page on Congress.gov · Bill text (GovInfo) · Status record (XML)

No recorded floor vote found.