VotedBy VotedBy ⌕
Election Day · Tue, Nov 3See how your members of Congress voted →

H.Con.Res. 48 · 112th Congress

Expressing the sense of Congress that the Secretary of the Navy should name a Littoral Combat Ship the U.S.S.…

Full title

Expressing the sense of Congress that the Secretary of the Navy should name a Littoral Combat Ship the U.S.S. Ypsilanti, in honor of Ypsilanti, Michigan.

Key: what the circles and colors mean

Each circle is a bill. The ring fills as it moves through Congress:

IntroducedPassed one chamberPassed both chambersBecame law (gold)Resolution agreed to (full, dark)Failed or vetoed (gray)

Under the number: the Yea · Nay count of its final (or latest) recorded vote. On a member's page, the small badge is how that member voted: Y Yea / Aye, N Nay / No, P Present, – Not voting.

Gold and violet are only for Yea and Nay; they never mean a party. A member's party is the letter on their photo.

Never voted on. It didn't reach a floor vote before the 112th Congress ended, so it expired. A bill has to be introduced again to be considered in a new Congress.

No cosponsors.

Expresses the sense of Congress that the Secretary of the Navy should name a littoral combat ship in honor of Ypsilanti, Michigan.

What it does: CRS summary · Introduced in House · May 4, 2011

Expresses the sense of Congress that the Secretary of the Navy should name a littoral combat ship in honor of Ypsilanti, Michigan.

Written by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service. All summary versions on Congress.gov

About this bill and sources

Official title: Expressing the sense of Congress that the Secretary of the Navy should name a Littoral Combat Ship the U.S.S. Ypsilanti, in honor of Ypsilanti, Michigan.

Latest action (May 18, 2011): Referred to the Subcommittee on Seapower and Projection Forces.

Policy area: Armed Forces and National Security · Origin: House · Introduced: May 4, 2011

Official page on Congress.gov · Bill text (GovInfo) · Status record (XML)

No recorded floor vote found.