H.Res. 667 · 111th Congress
Raising a question of the privileges of the House.
Key: what the circles and colors mean
Each circle is a bill. The ring fills as it moves through Congress:
Under the number: the Yea · Nay count of its final (or latest) recorded vote. On a member's page, the small badge is how that member voted: Y Yea / Aye, N Nay / No, P Present, – Not voting.
Gold and violet are only for Yea and Nay; they never mean a party. A member's party is the letter on their photo.
No cosponsors.
Requires the House Committee on Standards of Official Conduct to immediately establish an investigative subcommittee and begin an investigation into the relationship between: (1) the source and timing of past campaign contributions to Members of the House related to the raided prominent defense-lobbying firm; and (2) earmark requests made by Members on…
What it does: CRS summary · Introduced in House · Jul 22, 2009
Requires the House Committee on Standards of Official Conduct to immediately establish an investigative subcommittee and begin an investigation into the relationship between: (1) the source and timing of past campaign contributions to Members of the House related to the raided prominent defense-lobbying firm; and (2) earmark requests made by Members on behalf of the firm's clients.
Written by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service. All summary versions on Congress.gov
About this bill and sources
Official title: Raising a question of the privileges of the House.
Latest action (Jul 22, 2009): On motion to table the measure Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 224 - 189, 14 Present (Roll no. 605).
Policy area: Congress · Origin: House · Introduced: Jul 22, 2009
Official page on Congress.gov · Bill text (GovInfo) · Status record (XML) · Embed in your story
Latest vote · House · Jul 22, 2009
Setting aside (motion to table) — Passed. Vote details
Speaker of the House: Nancy Pelosi