H.Res. 1607 · 111th Congress
Disapproving Judge Walker's Proposition 8 Decision on Same-Sex Marriage.
Key: what the circles and colors mean
Each circle is a bill. The ring fills as it moves through Congress:
Under the number: the Yea · Nay count of its final (or latest) recorded vote. On a member's page, the small badge is how that member voted: Y Yea / Aye, N Nay / No, P Present, – Not voting.
Gold and violet are only for Yea and Nay; they never mean a party. A member's party is the letter on their photo.
Never voted on. It didn't reach a floor vote before the 111th Congress ended, so it expired. A bill has to be introduced again to be considered in a new Congress.
23 cosponsors · 23 R
17 signed on when it was introduced; the rest joined later. Cosponsors who withdrew aren't shown.
Expresses the sense of the House of Representatives that: (1) Chief U.S. District Judge Vaughn R.
What it does: CRS summary · Introduced in House · Aug 10, 2010
Expresses the sense of the House of Representatives that: (1) Chief U.S. District Judge Vaughn R. Walker failed to conduct himself in an impartial manner before striking down California's popularly enacted Proposition 8 and thereby redefined traditional marriage to include same-sex relationships; and (2) Judge Walker's decision to strike down Proposition 8 is wrong.
Written by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service. All summary versions on Congress.gov
About this bill and sources
Official title: Disapproving Judge Walker's Proposition 8 Decision on Same-Sex Marriage.
Latest action (Dec 20, 2010): Referred to the Subcommittee on Courts and Competition Policy.
Policy area: Families · Origin: House · Introduced: Aug 10, 2010
Official page on Congress.gov · Bill text (GovInfo) · Status record (XML)
No recorded floor vote found.