Administrative Law Judges Retirement Act of 2009

Key: what the circles and colors mean

Each circle is a bill. The ring fills as it moves through Congress:

IntroducedPassed one chamberPassed both chambersBecame law (gold)Resolution agreed to (full, dark)Failed or vetoed (gray)

Under the number: the Yea · Nay count of its final (or latest) recorded vote. On a member's page, the small badge is how that member voted: Y Yea / Aye, N Nay / No, P Present, – Not voting.

Gold and violet are only for Yea and Nay; they never mean a party. A member's party is the letter on their photo.

Never voted on. It didn't reach a floor vote before the 111th Congress ended, so it expired. A bill has to be introduced again to be considered in a new Congress.

D KucinichSponsor

29 cosponsors · 26 D, 3 R

4 signed on when it was introduced; the rest joined later. Cosponsors who withdrew aren't shown.

Administrative Law Judges Retirement Act of 2009 - Sets forth separate provisions for government and employee contributions, annuity eligibility requirements (ten years of service and age 60), early retirement, and annuity computation (2.5% and 1.7%, respectively, of average pay for each year of service) for administrative law judges under the Civil Service…

What it does: CRS summary · Introduced in House · Jun 12, 2009

Written by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service. All summary versions on Congress.gov

About this bill and sources

Official title: Administrative Law Judges Retirement Act of 2009

Latest action (Jun 26, 2009): Referred to the Subcommittee on Federal Workforce, Post Office, and the District of Columbia.

Policy area: Government Operations and Politics · Origin: House · Introduced: Jun 12, 2009

Official page on Congress.gov · Bill text (GovInfo) · Status record (XML)

No recorded floor vote found.