VotedBy VotedBy ⌕
Election Day · Tue, Nov 3See how your members of Congress voted →

H.Res. 967 · 110th Congress

Providing for consideration of the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 263) to establish the Joint Select…

Full title

Providing for consideration of the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 263) to establish the Joint Select Committee on Earmark Reform, and for other purposes.

Key: what the circles and colors mean

Each circle is a bill. The ring fills as it moves through Congress:

IntroducedPassed one chamberPassed both chambersBecame law (gold)Resolution agreed to (full, dark)Failed or vetoed (gray)

Under the number: the Yea · Nay count of its final (or latest) recorded vote. On a member's page, the small badge is how that member voted: Y Yea / Aye, N Nay / No, P Present, – Not voting.

Gold and violet are only for Yea and Nay; they never mean a party. A member's party is the letter on their photo.

Never voted on. It didn't reach a floor vote before the 110th Congress ended, so it expired. A bill has to be introduced again to be considered in a new Congress.

2 cosponsors · 2 R

2 signed on when it was introduced; the rest joined later. Cosponsors who withdrew aren't shown.

Sets forth the rule for consideration of the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 263) to establish the Joint Select Committee on Earmark Reform.

What it does: CRS summary · Introduced in House · Feb 7, 2008
Sets forth the rule for consideration of the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 263) to establish the Joint Select Committee on Earmark Reform.

Written by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service. All summary versions on Congress.gov

About this bill and sources

Official title: Providing for consideration of the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 263) to establish the Joint Select Committee on Earmark Reform, and for other purposes.

Latest action (Feb 7, 2008): Referred to the House Committee on Rules.

Policy area: Congress · Origin: House · Introduced: Feb 7, 2008

Official page on Congress.gov · Bill text (GovInfo) · Status record (XML)

No recorded floor vote found.