VotedBy VotedBy ⌕
Election Day · Tue, Nov 3See how your members of Congress voted →

H.R. 107 · 110th Congress

To define marriage for all legal purposes in the District of Columbia to consist of the union of one man and…

Full title

To define marriage for all legal purposes in the District of Columbia to consist of the union of one man and one woman.

Key: what the circles and colors mean

Each circle is a bill. The ring fills as it moves through Congress:

IntroducedPassed one chamberPassed both chambersBecame law (gold)Resolution agreed to (full, dark)Failed or vetoed (gray)

Under the number: the Yea · Nay count of its final (or latest) recorded vote. On a member's page, the small badge is how that member voted: Y Yea / Aye, N Nay / No, P Present, – Not voting.

Gold and violet are only for Yea and Nay; they never mean a party. A member's party is the letter on their photo.

Never voted on. It didn't reach a floor vote before the 110th Congress ended, so it expired. A bill has to be introduced again to be considered in a new Congress.

No cosponsors.

Defines "marriage" for all legal purposes in the District of Columbia to mean the union of one man and one woman.

What it does: CRS summary · Introduced in House · Jan 4, 2007

Defines "marriage" for all legal purposes in the District of Columbia to mean the union of one man and one woman.

Written by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service. All summary versions on Congress.gov

About this bill and sources

Official title: To define marriage for all legal purposes in the District of Columbia to consist of the union of one man and one woman.

Latest action (Mar 20, 2007): Referred to the Subcommittee on Federal Workforce, Post Office, and the District of Columbia.

Policy area: Government Operations and Politics · Origin: House · Introduced: Jan 4, 2007

Official page on Congress.gov · Bill text (GovInfo) · Status record (XML)

No recorded floor vote found.