H.R. 6176 · 109th Congress
To establish requirements for the consideration of supplemental appropriation bills.
Key: what the circles and colors mean
Each circle is a bill. The ring fills as it moves through Congress:
Under the number: the Yea · Nay count of its final (or latest) recorded vote. On a member's page, the small badge is how that member voted: Y Yea / Aye, N Nay / No, P Present, – Not voting.
Gold and violet are only for Yea and Nay; they never mean a party. A member's party is the letter on their photo.
Never voted on. It didn't reach a floor vote before the 109th Congress ended, so it expired. A bill has to be introduced again to be considered in a new Congress.
R
NeugebauerSponsor27 cosponsors · 27 R
R
Akin
JG
R
Gresham Barrett
BC
R
Cubin
CC
R
Chocola
JC
R
Campbell
JF
R
Flake
TF
R
Feeney
VF
R
Foxx
LF
R
Fortuño
GG
R
Gutknecht
SG
R
Garrett
PG
R
Gingrey
MH
R
Hart
JH
R
Hensarling
SJ
R
Johnson
RK
R
Kuhl
MM
R
Musgrave
PM
R
McHenry
KM
R
Marchant
JP
R
Pitts
TP
R
Poe
DR
R
Rohrabacher
JR
R
Ryun
PR
R
Ryan
MSR
Sodrel
LW
R
Westmoreland
JM
R
Miller26 signed on when it was introduced; the rest joined later. Cosponsors who withdrew aren't shown.
Makes it out of order in the House of Representatives or the Senate to consider any measure making supplemental appropriations for two or more unrelated emergencies.
What it does: CRS summary · Introduced in House · Sep 26, 2006
Makes it out of order in the House of Representatives or the Senate to consider any measure making supplemental appropriations for two or more unrelated emergencies.
Prohibits any provisions containing spending that is not designated as emergency spending from being reported in a measure making supplemental appropriations.
Makes it out of order in the House or the Senate to consider: (1) the conference report on a measure making supplemental appropriations if such measure contains such spending; or (2) any bill, joint resolution, or conference report if the accompanying report or joint statement of managers does not comply with this Act.
Requires the Committee on Appropriations or any other House or Senate committee that reports any bill or joint resolution that provides budget authority for any emergency, the accompanying report, or the joint explanatory statement accompanying the conference report on the measure to: (1) identify all provisions that provide budget authority and the resulting outlays for such emergency; (2) state the reasons why such budget authority meets the definition of an emergency; and (3) justify why such funding is in a supplemental appropriation and not the regular appropriation for the next fiscal year.
Prohibits a provision containing an earmark from being reported in a measure making supplemental appropriations.
Makes it out of order in the House or the Senate to consider the conference report on any measure making supplemental appropriations containing earmarks.
Written by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service. All summary versions on Congress.gov
About this bill and sources
Official title: To establish requirements for the consideration of supplemental appropriation bills.
Latest action (Sep 26, 2006): Referred to the House Committee on Rules.
Policy area: Congress · Origin: House · Introduced: Sep 26, 2006
Official page on Congress.gov · Bill text (GovInfo) · Status record (XML)
No recorded floor vote found.