VotedBy VotedBy ⌕
Election Day · Tue, Nov 3See how your members of Congress voted →

H.R. 5899 · 109th Congress

To provide additional flood control storage at the Upper and Lower Baker Dams.

Key: what the circles and colors mean

Each circle is a bill. The ring fills as it moves through Congress:

IntroducedPassed one chamberPassed both chambersBecame law (gold)Resolution agreed to (full, dark)Failed or vetoed (gray)

Under the number: the Yea · Nay count of its final (or latest) recorded vote. On a member's page, the small badge is how that member voted: Y Yea / Aye, N Nay / No, P Present, – Not voting.

Gold and violet are only for Yea and Nay; they never mean a party. A member's party is the letter on their photo.

Never voted on. It didn't reach a floor vote before the 109th Congress ended, so it expired. A bill has to be introduced again to be considered in a new Congress.

No cosponsors.

Directs the Secretary of the Army to assume responsibility for operational measures at Upper and Lower Baker Dams, Baker River, Washington, to provide additional storage for flood damage reduction upon determining that such measures are practicable and environmentally acceptable.

What it does: CRS summary · Introduced in House · Jul 26, 2006

Directs the Secretary of the Army to assume responsibility for operational measures at Upper and Lower Baker Dams, Baker River, Washington, to provide additional storage for flood damage reduction upon determining that such measures are practicable and environmentally acceptable.

Written by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service. All summary versions on Congress.gov

About this bill and sources

Official title: To provide additional flood control storage at the Upper and Lower Baker Dams.

Latest action (Jul 27, 2006): Referred to the Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment.

Policy area: Water Resources Development · Origin: House · Introduced: Jul 26, 2006

Official page on Congress.gov · Bill text (GovInfo) · Status record (XML)

No recorded floor vote found.