S.Res. 103 · 108th Congress
A resolution to authorize representation by the Senate Legal Counsel in the case of John Jenkel v. Daniel K.…
Full title
A resolution to authorize representation by the Senate Legal Counsel in the case of John Jenkel v. Daniel K. Akaka, et al.
Key: what the circles and colors mean
Each circle is a bill. The ring fills as it moves through Congress:
Under the number: the Yea · Nay count of its final (or latest) recorded vote. On a member's page, the small badge is how that member voted: Y Yea / Aye, N Nay / No, P Present, – Not voting.
Gold and violet are only for Yea and Nay; they never mean a party. A member's party is the letter on their photo.
Agreed to without a recorded vote. It was agreed to by voice vote or unanimous consent, which don't record how each member voted.
R
FristSponsor1 cosponsor · 1 D
1 signed on when it was introduced; the rest joined later. Cosponsors who withdrew aren't shown.
- Senate Introduced Apr 2, 2003
- Senate Passed Apr 2, 2003
What it does: CRS summary · Passed Senate without amendment · Apr 2, 2003
Authorizes the Senate Legal Counsel to represent the Members of the Senate who are defendants in the case of John Jenkel v. Daniel K. Akaka, et al.
Written by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service. All summary versions on Congress.gov
About this bill and sources
Official title: A resolution to authorize representation by the Senate Legal Counsel in the case of John Jenkel v. Daniel K. Akaka, et al.
Latest action (Apr 2, 2003): Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S4729-4730; text of measure as passed Senate: CR S4730)
Policy area: Congress · Origin: Senate · Introduced: Apr 2, 2003
Official page on Congress.gov · Bill text (GovInfo) · Status record (XML)
- Senate Introduced Apr 2, 2003
- Senate Passed Apr 2, 2003
No recorded floor vote found.