S.Con.Res. 130 · 108th Congress
A concurrent resolution expressing the sense of Congress that the Supreme Court of the United States should…
Full title
A concurrent resolution expressing the sense of Congress that the Supreme Court of the United States should act expeditiously to resolve the confusion and inconsistency in the Federal criminal justice system caused by its decision in Blakely v. Washington, and for other purposes.
Key: what the circles and colors mean
Each circle is a bill. The ring fills as it moves through Congress:
Under the number: the Yea · Nay count of its final (or latest) recorded vote. On a member's page, the small badge is how that member voted: Y Yea / Aye, N Nay / No, P Present, – Not voting.
Gold and violet are only for Yea and Nay; they never mean a party. A member's party is the letter on their photo.
Passed the Senate without a recorded vote, then expired. It passed by voice vote or unanimous consent, which don't record how each member voted, but didn't become law before the 108th Congress ended.
R
HatchSponsor15 cosponsors · 7 D, 8 R
D
Biden
LC
R
Craig
MDR
DeWine
RD
D
Durbin
RF
D
Feingold
DF
D
Feinstein
TK
D
Kennedy
PL
D
Leahy
CS
D
Schumer
SC
R
Chambliss
JC
R
Cornyn
BF
R
Frist
LG
R
Graham
CG
R
Grassley
JS
R
Sessions9 signed on when it was introduced; the rest joined later. Cosponsors who withdrew aren't shown.
- Senate Introduced Jul 21, 2004
- Senate Passed Jul 21, 2004
Expresses the sense of Congress that the Supreme Court should act expeditiously to resolve the current confusion and inconsistency in the Federal criminal justice system by promptly considering and ruling on the constitutionality of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines.
What it does: CRS summary · Passed Senate without amendment · Jul 21, 2004
(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)
Expresses the sense of Congress that the Supreme Court should act expeditiously to resolve the current confusion and inconsistency in the Federal criminal justice system by promptly considering and ruling on the constitutionality of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines.
Written by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service. All summary versions on Congress.gov
About this bill and sources
Official title: A concurrent resolution expressing the sense of Congress that the Supreme Court of the United States should act expeditiously to resolve the confusion and inconsistency in the Federal criminal justice system caused by its decision in Blakely v. Washington, and for other purposes.
Latest action (Nov 5, 2004): Referred to the Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property.
Policy area: Law · Origin: Senate · Introduced: Jul 21, 2004
Official page on Congress.gov · Bill text (GovInfo) · Status record (XML)
- Senate Introduced Jul 21, 2004
- Senate Passed Jul 21, 2004
No recorded floor vote found.