H.R. 4577 · 108th Congress
To allow binding arbitration clauses to be included in all contracts affecting the land within the Gila River…
Full title
To allow binding arbitration clauses to be included in all contracts affecting the land within the Gila River Indian Community Reservation.
Key: what the circles and colors mean
Each circle is a bill. The ring fills as it moves through Congress:
Under the number: the Yea · Nay count of its final (or latest) recorded vote. On a member's page, the small badge is how that member voted: Y Yea / Aye, N Nay / No, P Present, – Not voting.
Gold and violet are only for Yea and Nay; they never mean a party. A member's party is the letter on their photo.
Never voted on. It didn't reach a floor vote before the 108th Congress ended, so it expired. A bill has to be introduced again to be considered in a new Congress.
D
GrijalvaSponsorNo cosponsors.
Amends specified Federal law to allow binding arbitration clauses to be included in all contracts, including leases (as under current law), affecting the land within the Gila River Indian Community Reservation.
What it does: CRS summary · Introduced in House · Jun 15, 2004
Amends specified Federal law to allow binding arbitration clauses to be included in all contracts, including leases (as under current law), affecting the land within the Gila River Indian Community Reservation.
Written by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service. All summary versions on Congress.gov
About this bill and sources
Official title: To allow binding arbitration clauses to be included in all contracts affecting the land within the Gila River Indian Community Reservation.
Latest action (Jun 15, 2004): Referred to the House Committee on Resources.
Policy area: Native Americans · Origin: House · Introduced: Jun 15, 2004
Official page on Congress.gov · Bill text (GovInfo) · Status record (XML)
No recorded floor vote found.