VotedBy VotedBy ⌕
Election Day · Tue, Nov 3See how your members of Congress voted →

H.R. 435 · 108th Congress

For the relief of Robert and Verda Shatusky.

Key: what the circles and colors mean

Each circle is a bill. The ring fills as it moves through Congress:

IntroducedPassed one chamberPassed both chambersBecame law (gold)Resolution agreed to (full, dark)Failed or vetoed (gray)

Under the number: the Yea · Nay count of its final (or latest) recorded vote. On a member's page, the small badge is how that member voted: Y Yea / Aye, N Nay / No, P Present, – Not voting.

Gold and violet are only for Yea and Nay; they never mean a party. A member's party is the letter on their photo.

Never voted on. It didn't reach a floor vote before the 108th Congress ended, so it expired. A bill has to be introduced again to be considered in a new Congress.

No cosponsors.

Deems Robert Shatusky to have had a current connection with the railroad industry at the time that his annuity under the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974 began to accrue for purposes of entitlement to payments under the Act. Provides for payment of past supplemental annuity benefits to Shatusky.

What it does: CRS summary · Introduced in House · Jan 28, 2003
Deems Robert Shatusky to have had a current connection with the railroad industry at the time that his annuity under the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974 began to accrue for purposes of entitlement to payments under the Act.

Provides for payment of past supplemental annuity benefits to Shatusky.

Written by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service. All summary versions on Congress.gov

About this bill and sources

Official title: For the relief of Robert and Verda Shatusky.

Latest action (Mar 6, 2003): Referred to the Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security, and Claims.

Policy area: Private Legislation · Origin: House · Introduced: Jan 28, 2003

Official page on Congress.gov · Bill text (GovInfo) · Status record (XML)

No recorded floor vote found.