Western Reserve Heritage Areas Study Act

Key: what the circles and colors mean

Each circle is a bill. The ring fills as it moves through Congress:

IntroducedPassed one chamberPassed both chambersBecame law (gold)Resolution agreed to (full, dark)Failed or vetoed (gray)

Under the number: the Yea · Nay count of its final (or latest) recorded vote. On a member's page, the small badge is how that member voted: Y Yea / Aye, N Nay / No, P Present, – Not voting.

Gold and violet are only for Yea and Nay; they never mean a party. A member's party is the letter on their photo.

Passed the House without a recorded vote, then expired. It passed by voice vote or unanimous consent, which don't record how each member voted, but didn't become law before the 108th Congress ended.

D RyanSponsor

9 cosponsors · 6 D, 3 R

0 signed on when it was introduced; the rest joined later. Cosponsors who withdrew aren't shown.

House Introduced Oct 7, 2003
House Passed Sep 21, 2004

Western Reserve Heritage Areas Study Act - Requires the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study regarding the suitability and feasibility of establishing the Western Reserve Heritage Area in the Ohio counties of Trumbull, Mahoning, Ashtabula, Portage, Geague, Lake, Cuyahoga, Summit, Medina, Huron, Lorain, Erie, Ottawa, and Ashland.

What it does: CRS summary · Reported to House with amendment(s) · Sep 7, 2004

Written by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service. All summary versions on Congress.gov

About this bill and sources

Official title: Western Reserve Heritage Areas Study Act

Latest action (Sep 22, 2004): Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

Policy area: Public Lands and Natural Resources · Origin: House · Introduced: Oct 7, 2003

Official page on Congress.gov · Bill text (GovInfo) · Status record (XML)

House Introduced Oct 7, 2003
House Passed Sep 21, 2004

No recorded floor vote found.