H.R. 2165 · 108th Congress
Coastal and Historic Communities Protection Act of 2003
Key: what the circles and colors mean
Each circle is a bill. The ring fills as it moves through Congress:
Under the number: the Yea · Nay count of its final (or latest) recorded vote. On a member's page, the small badge is how that member voted: Y Yea / Aye, N Nay / No, P Present, – Not voting.
Gold and violet are only for Yea and Nay; they never mean a party. A member's party is the letter on their photo.
Never voted on. It didn't reach a floor vote before the 108th Congress ended, so it expired. A bill has to be introduced again to be considered in a new Congress.
R
CoxSponsor1 cosponsor · 1 R
1 signed on when it was introduced; the rest joined later. Cosponsors who withdrew aren't shown.
Coastal and Historic Communities Protection Act of 2003 - Prohibits the Secretary of Transportation from providing funds to study, design, engineer, or construct a second set of rail tracks (double tracking) on the Pacific Surfliner corridor through the Orange County, California, coastal and historic cities of Dana Point, San Juan Capistrano, and San…
What it does: CRS summary · Introduced in House · May 20, 2003
Coastal and Historic Communities Protection Act of 2003 - Prohibits the Secretary of Transportation from providing funds to study, design, engineer, or construct a second set of rail tracks (double tracking) on the Pacific Surfliner corridor through the Orange County, California, coastal and historic cities of Dana Point, San Juan Capistrano, and San Clemente.
Written by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service. All summary versions on Congress.gov
About this bill and sources
Official title: Coastal and Historic Communities Protection Act of 2003
Latest action (May 21, 2003): Referred to the Subcommittee on Railroads.
Policy area: Transportation and Public Works · Origin: House · Introduced: May 20, 2003
Official page on Congress.gov · Bill text (GovInfo) · Status record (XML)
No recorded floor vote found.